scholarly journals Quality of care for colorectal cancer in a fee-for-service and health maintenance organization practice

Cancer ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 2418-2425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally W. Vernon ◽  
John I. Hughes ◽  
Virginia M. Heckel ◽  
Gilchrist L. Jackson
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1140-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire F. Snyder ◽  
Kevin D. Frick ◽  
Robert J. Herbert ◽  
Amanda L. Blackford ◽  
Bridget A. Neville ◽  
...  

Purpose Building on previous research documenting differences in preventive care quality between cancer survivors and noncancer controls, this study examines comorbid condition care. Methods Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) –Medicare database, we examined comorbid condition quality of care in patients with locoregional breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer diagnosed in 2004 who were age ≥ 66 years at diagnosis, who had survived ≥ 3 years, and who were enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare. Controls were frequency matched to cases on age, sex, race, and region. Quality of care was assessed from day 366 through day 1,095 postdiagnosis using published indicators of chronic (n = 10) and acute (n = 19) condition care. The proportion of eligible cancer survivors and controls who received recommended care was compared by using Fisher's exact tests. The chronic and acute indicators, respectively, were then combined into single logistic regression models for each cancer type to compare survivors' care receipt to that of controls, adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic variables and controlling for within-patient variation. Results The sample matched 8,661 cancer survivors to 17,322 controls (mean age, 75 years; 65% male; 85% white). Colorectal cancer survivors were less likely than controls to receive appropriate care on both the chronic (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95) and acute (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.85) indicators. Prostate cancer survivors were more likely to receive appropriate chronic care (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.38) but less likely to receive quality acute care (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.87). Breast cancer survivors received care equivalent to controls on both the chronic (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.17) and acute (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13) indicators. Conclusion Because we found differences by cancer type, research exploring factors associated with these differences in care quality is needed.


1981 ◽  
Vol 304 (13) ◽  
pp. 784-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Wilner ◽  
Stephen C. Schoenbaum ◽  
Richard R. Monson ◽  
Richard N. Winickoff

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Goshen ◽  
Eran Choman ◽  
Ayelet Ran ◽  
Efrat Muller ◽  
Revital Kariv ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate in a sample of adults who had been noncompliant with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening whether screening could be enhanced by an automated patient recall system based on identifying high-risk individuals using the ColonFlag test and an electronic medical record database. Methods A total of 79,671 individuals who were determined to be noncompliant with current screening recommendations were identified in the Maccabi Health Services program in Israel. Their cancer risk was determined by ColonFlag using information on age, sex, and CBC results. Doctors of individuals who were flagged as high risk were notified and asked to follow up with their patients. Results The ColonFlag identified 688 men and women who scored in the highest 0.87 percentile. Of these individuals, 254 had colonoscopies performed by Maccabi physicians, and 19 CRCs (7.5%) were found. An additional 15 cancers primarily identified outside of Maccabi were found through code matching. Conclusion The ColonFlag test is a rapid, efficient, and inexpensive test that can be applied to scan electronic medical records to identify individuals at high risk of CRC who would otherwise avoid screening.


1995 ◽  
Vol 166 (S27) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth B. Wells

Background. Cost containment mechanisms, such as prepayment, are being considered or implemented in the US and elsewhere, but there have been few studies of the effects of such mechanisms on quality or outcomes of care for individuals with serious psychiatric disorders.Method. Key results from US studies on cost containment and their implications are reviewed.Results. Cost savings in out-patient mental health care can be achieved through increasing the share of costs paid by the covered individual or through prepayment, but individuals with the greatest psychological distress or poor people may achieve worse outcomes under greater cost containment. Quality of care may be poorer under some forms of prepayment than under fee-for-service care, yet a national prospective payment mechanism for depressed elderly in-patients was not associated with a marked drop in quality or outcomes of care among those admitted.Conclusions. Prepayment, relative to fee-for-service is not always associated with lower outcomes or quality of care for affective disorders. Under cost containment, quality and outcomes of care, especially for the sick poor, should be monitored to identify adverse consequences.


1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Apolone ◽  
Roberto Grilli ◽  
Alexan A. Alexanian ◽  
Carlo Confalonieri ◽  
Roberto Labianca ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document